The Trailbreaker: Why getting lost can be the most important move
If you’ve ever woken up on a hot summer morning and had the dubious pleasure of discovering a single conga line of ants parading across your kitchen floor, you’ll know it isn’t the kind of parade that invites applause. They march with conviction, single-minded and single-file, in a line so straight and efficient it would make a German engineer weep. Each ant, nose to tail with its comrade ahead, seems to know precisely where it's going—because, of course, it does not.
Each ant in that line is following a scent trail laid down by the one before it. These aren’t abstract ideas or symbolic signals. They’re pheromones—chemicals ants use like breadcrumbs to build a map of the world. The stronger the trail, the more certain the path. No debates, no deliberation. Just an unblinking faith in the olfactory gospel of the ant ahead. They are “hooked on a feeling.”
It’s elegant, this system. Beautiful in its brutal efficiency. Energy is expensive in the animal kingdom, and for an ant, the return on investment matters. Studies have found that foraging ants can bring back as much as ten times the energy they expend on the trip. It’s capitalism with better discipline.
But here’s where it gets interesting. Watch long enough, and you’ll see her: the outlier. She’s not on the trail, or with the program. She’s off to the side, looping and spiraling, moving like she’s chasing a thought no one else can hear. To the casual observer, she’s completely off-task—the weak link. But to the colony? She’s something else entirely, whether it knows it or not.
To put it in Hollywood storytelling vernacular, she is “the One.”
The Neo of the ant world.
Because food sources vanish. Pheromone trails fade. Crumbs get cleaned. What worked yesterday may not work tomorrow. And the only reason the colony doesn’t starve when that happens? Her. The ant who wandered. The one who dared to ignore the "we’ve always done it this way" crowd.
The ant who dares to deviate may be the one who discovers tomorrow’s salvation. These exploratory foragers are rare but critical. Their behavior ensures the colony isn’t trapped in yesterday’s success. In other words, they’re not just workers—they’re innovators.
Biologists have discovered that some ant colonies even modulate how many explorers they send out based on the success rate of returning foragers. It’s a feedback loop. A decentralized, self-correcting system that mimics some of the most advanced forms of organizational intelligence humans have yet to design.
This lone wanderer, then, is the system’s gamble. A walking paradox. The necessary inefficiency in a world obsessed with optimization. The future doesn’t belong to the efficient. It belongs to the curious.
And perhaps that’s the real sermon here: even in the ant kingdom, the way forward requires someone who dares to get lost.
References
Fewell, J.H. Energetic and time costs of foraging in harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22, 401–408 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00294977
Kolay, S., Boulay, R., & d’Ettorre, P. (2020). Regulation of ant foraging: A review of the role of information use and personality. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 734. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00734
Schilman, P. E., & Roces, F. (2006). Foraging energetics of a nectar-feeding ant: Metabolic expenditure as a function of food-source profitability. Journal of Experimental Biology, 209(20), 4091–4101. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.02478
Roth-Bejerano, N. Nature of the phytochrome effect on the binding of glycolate oxidase to peroxisomes in vitro. Planta 149, 252–256 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384561
Vogan, A.A. Please Make Yourself (Un)comfortable. (2025). The Ivan Von Noshrilgram Foundation Publications. www.AlistairAVogan.com
The Ivan Von Noshrilgram Foundation (IVNF) Laboratory for Excellence in Thinking (LET) (2025)